A Little (actually a lot of) Fishing Humor

January 12th, 2010 by battisti

I don’t know how many of you here on TackleTour/TackleTog have heard of Dave Mercer. Dave is Canada’s funny man when it comes to bass (and other species) fishing and his show – Facts of Fishing – airs on WFN and The Score. His show is unlike any other in the industry, coupling fishing tips and facts but more so, it’s presented with an unparalleled comedic style. Dave is an awesome angler, proven by his success on the Canadian trail, but his comedy is even better.

Yesterday Dave launched his new Facts of Fishing FYI on YouTube – a weekly YouTube show that offers a different (and I say that with tongue in cheek) look at fishing. Only Dave and his semi-twisted mind could come up with something like this and I think you’ll all like what he’s done.

So, without further adieu, here’s the link to the new show.

http://www.youtube.com/user/factsoffishing

I hope you all enjoy it.

Terry

Do They Listen?

October 27th, 2009 by battisti

flwseries_1AFLW just announced their 2010 schedule for the west and it appears that their old motto – “We listen to Our Customers” – has left the building.  I just recently finished a 4-part series for Inside Line (www.insideline.net) magazine on the recent decline in western tournament participation where I interviewed three well-known western anglers and the common denominator between the three of them was the circuits are fishing too far from the central location of California and they are going to venues that stink.

Well, FLW didn’t take what these guys (and many other for that matter) think to heart.  Here is FLW’s National Guard Western Series schedule for you.

Jan 13-16 Lake Shasta, Shasta Lake, Calif. (Snow Plow Mandatory)

May 5-8 Lake Roosevelt, Payson, Ariz. (Free gas card required)

June 9-12 California Delta, Stockton, Calif. (The Delta in June?)

Sept 22-25 Lake Mead, Las Vegas, Nev. (2 weeks after the U.S. Open?)

It’s almost as if FLW is purposefully doing the opposite of what the anglers want.  I don’t know for sure but I am willing to bet next year’s circuit will draw even less participation than this year’s meager 90-boat turnout.  Anyone wanna bet?

The State of Bass Fishing – Bass Clubs

June 29th, 2009 by battisti

What is the purpose of a bass club? Is it to help teach would-be anglers to bass fish? Is it a place for a bunch of anglers to socialize and share the common interest of bass fishing coupled with some friendly competition? Or, is it a place for the local BIG Stick to show off his local prowess, take the underlings’ money and never share with the rest of the club what he/she did to catch the fish?

Since ’78, I’ve been a member of three clubs – The Ambassadeurs of Southern California (1978 to 1986), the Eagle Rock Bassmasters – Idaho Falls, Idaho (1998 to 2001), and the Snake River Valley Bass Club – Blackfoot, Idaho (2001 to 2005). I’ve also been around and dealt with too many clubs to list over these years. I must also state (it should be obvious) that I took a break from club fishing for roughly 12 years.

When I joined the Ambassadeurs, I was 14 years old and pretty awed by the fact I was fishing against a bunch of people more than twice my age. The club rostered more than 50 anglers at any given time when I was in the club, club meetings were mandatory and each tournament was a draw format. In fact, every club I knew of in southern California at the time held their tournaments in a draw format.

The draw was done at the meeting prior the tournament – non-boaters drawn with boaters – and if there were more boaters than non-boaters, the extra boaters were drawn together, the first name out of the hat got to use his boat. Another caveat of the club was no two anglers could fish more than two tournaments together over the course of a year.

After the draw, the two anglers made arrangements for the tournament. Boater and non-boater drove to the lake together, kept a running list of bills accumulated for the day/weekend, the non-boater provided lunches/drinks for the day/weekend (this because the boater had to pay for the boat, oil, and insurance), and the bill for expenses was split down the middle between the two anglers when the tournament was over. This wasn’t just the way my club conducted operations, this was the way every club I knew of (and working at the tackle shop, I knew people in every bass club in southern Cal) conducted business.

There were many good aspects of operating a club in this manner. 1) You got to fish with at least 6 different anglers over the course of a year. This meant that there was a large number of learning opportunities for everyone in the club, 2) Cheating was essentially eliminated by the draw, 3) When all was said and done, each angler had paid exactly 50% of the expenses – there was no, “Here’s $10 for gas.” 4) The non-boaters actually would try and outdo one another on lunches they provided (every boater always wanted to draw Cliff Brockman, man he made a killer lunch).

Another thing about the club was it was treated as a learning experience for everyone. Winners of the prior tournament were required to present their winning pattern at the next meeting and we would even have guests give seminars from time to time.

Also, the clubs that I was associated with back then didn’t fish for money except for maybe a big-fish pot. We fished for AOY and a shot at making the Top-6 tournament at the end of the year. The Top-6 tournament was an end-of-year 2-day event that put the top-6 anglers from each club against each other. You wanted to make this tournament.

What the no-award money scenario brought to the table was this: People actually helped each other on the water. I don’t know how many times guys would flag down other club members to tell them about a bite that was happening and the post-tournament briefs were all about making each member a better angler. You’d be surprised how much information was given out at these briefings. Topo maps were shown, boat position, water depth, retrieve, baits used etc.

The state of the bass club today, though, is dismal. A club is lucky to have 10 boats on the water for any given tournament and many clubs are happy if they get 6 boats. It’s been this way for years and no one can blame it on Bush, Obama or the tough economic times we’re facing today.

So, what is it that’s taken anglers away from bass clubs? I don’t know if it’s one thing or a collection of things but from my experience, it all boils down to the new blood not getting what they came for.

New anglers get brought into or join a club expecting to learn. They expect to be mentored by experienced anglers with the hope of becoming a better angler. What I’ve seen happen the last 20 years or so is the opposite.

Clubs in the last 20 years have predominantly gone from a teaching organization with minimal money involved to high-dollar jackpot tournaments and the new guy gets stuck donating his money with little in return.

Couple this with the fact that most club organizations I’ve come in contact with during this time fish a “partners” format the new guy doesn’t get to fish with the best anglers because they’re already paired with their buddy.

The new guy/gal may stick around for a year but after that they reevaluate their investment and having minimal to show for it, leaves. That angler is turned off towards bass fishing and the club flounders. That is my opinion.

So what do bass clubs need to do in order to prevent their slow death? In my opinion, it boils down to the money. Take the money out of the equation and people are more apt to share information. If you need your weekend bass club winnings to pay your boat payment; 1) maybe you shouldn’t own a boat and/or 2) if you want to show just how big a stick you are, go fish a AAA Pro/Am or draw event where there’s real money involved.

Teach the new guys how to fish and they’ll continue to fish. Take their money and leave them only with empty pockets and your club is bound to implode.

The State of Bass Fishing Today

June 29th, 2009 by battisti

There’s something on my mind and it’s been bugging me for quite some time. It’s a collection of problems, with the root of it culminating into where bass fishing has gone since I first started chasing the green and brown fish in 1974. I’ve talked about it with numerous friends over the years – people who were involved in the sport back in its glory days – and all agree there are problems. The latest conversation was last night with long-time friend and southern California tournament legend – who I will not name – and it sparked me to write this series blogs.

So, since Cal, JIP and Zander gave me this place to write whatever the hell I please, I’m going to use some of the space to vent my frustration. This blog is bound to upset, tweak and outright piss off some. If you end up in one of those categories, I’m sorry. But, I hope you will just listen to my opinions and maybe contribute to the dialogue.

What I hope is that this string of thoughts (again, my thoughts) hits home with a number of you and we can maybe, just maybe, bring bass fishing back to what it was during its heyday. It’s not my purpose here to lay blame or accuse anyone of, what I see as, destroying bass fishing. My purpose in this blog is to open the lines of communication, think about the sport and maybe come up with some solutions.

What gives me the right to write on the subject of this blog? Well, one reason is my passion for the sport – but we all have a passion for the sport. Another is I’ve been involved in the sport of bass fishing for 35 years. I have also worked in the industry since 1978: 10 years at one of the premier bass fishing stores from 1978 through 1988, 6 years as a tackle manufacturer and 8 years as a writer covering bass fishing. I fished my first club tournament in 1978 and have been associated with the scene in one form or another since that time. I think the above stated gives me the right to voice my opinion of where we were and where we’ve landed and the problems associated. If you don’t agree, I’m sure you’ll let me know. I’m a big boy so have at me.

Anyway, I need to collect my thoughts before I go spouting rhetoric throughout the ether. So, if you have any comments about the above, let me know.

battisti

Name That Bait III

June 22nd, 2009 by battisti

Okay, I’ve had some requests to post another Name That Bait blog so here it is.  As with the other Name That Bait contests, you win nothing but the fact you knew what something old and obscure – wait, I’ve been called that recently – is.mystery-worm

Here’s this edition.  This is a worm that was very popular as one of the first flipping worms but also held a very soft spot in the socal anglers’ hearts on Castaic in the smoke color.  The worm has been out of production since the really early 80s (I’m talking maybe 1980) and my old boss at Bob’s Tackle in Norwalk actually went in partnership with a guy to bring the worm back around 1982.  I remember this because that was the year I graduated high school.  Anyway, that venture went “Chicken Fillets” up and never got off the ground, unfortunately.

Now, the problem with this is I know the name of the worm and I “think” the name of the company is the same – but I could be wrong.  So, what I’m looking for here is only the name of the worm.  Have at it!!

Catching Dinosaurs – Part Three, Terry Lost His Cherry

June 17th, 2009 by battisti

Photo Credit Bryan Forsmann and battisti

Sunday started just like Saturday morning – no one wanted to rise due to fishing into the wee hours of the morning. I rose at 8:00 am to find Bryan and Chuck at the bank along with Kim and his clan. My agenda Sunday was to get up, launch the boat and go bass fish.

I spent the next hour or so cleaning and preparing the boat and rods. By 9:00 in the morning Bryan and I were cruising at 70-mph up the river arm of the lake – a 30-mile run. Bryan and I fished a number of areas that, in the past, had been very productive but didn’t pan out. We had a couple of follows on a Lucky Craft LV-300 but nothing wanted to commit. The water was still cold from run-off and the amount of floating weeds in the 5-mph current made it difficult to get a cast off without dragging in a pound of vegetation. At noon we called it a day and headed back to camp.

Sunday was my day to head home. If I was to change my status from “sturgeon virgin” to “sturgeon catcher” I didn’t have much time. The gang knew this and wanted me to “land” my first real sturgeon. Chuck and Robert decided to pack up camp and head to the other side of the river in order to hopefully increase our odds.

I had planned my departure time to be 4:00 pm. This would give me time to make the 4-hour drive home and unload my boat in daylight. The problem with this was we didn’t get set up on the opposite shoreline until 3:00 pm, which only gave me an hour to rid myself of the “virgin” moniker.

Six rods were placed at strategic positions along the various seams in the current. In all, we covered a good 50-yards of river.

The first bite came within 5 minutes as I was texting a friend – i.e: not paying attention. The fish ate the bait with such force that it pulled the rod holder to the ground and began dragging the rod down the embankment and towards the river. I dropped my phone and grabbed the butt of the rod right before it got out of reach.  The fish was gone.

We pounded the rod holder back into the ground and continued fishing.

Twenty minutes later Chuck made a cast with a fresh bait and was bit before he was able to get the rod in the holder. He set the hook, screamed TERRY, and the fight was on.

Last minute effort.

Last minute effort.

It was evident this was another big fish as its body came halfway out of the water. One thing about these fish is you don’t know if they’re going to stay in the deep water and sulk after their initial jump or hightail it downstream and take every remaining inch of line off your reel.

This fish decided to hightail it downstream.

There’s not much you can do from shore with a fish that weighs in excess of 300 pounds when it decides to move. About all you can do is hold on, let the drag and rod do the work and hope like hell the fish stops before you run out of shoreline and/or line.

In less than 10 seconds, the fish had ripped off in excess of 100 yards of line and created so much friction in the drag system that it was hot to the touch. Out of room on the bank to follow the fish, I slowly began to walk the fish back up the shore while trying to regain some of the line I had lost. 10 minutes into the battle, I was gaining on both fronts.

By this time we had drawn a crowd of onlookers – namely a group of people from Ohio who had never seen the likes of a sturgeon. Unfortunately for me, this group, mainly consisting of kids and a parent or two, all decided to take front row seats at the water’s edge. As I guided the fish towards shore, the fish saw the large crowd, their feet nearly in the water, and turned tail back downstream in another run that was longer and faster than the initial run. Here I am again, out of bank to run down and nearly out of line.

With the rod held high, I slowly walked back to my original fighting position and began the slow, arduous task of recovering line. Roughly ten minutes later I found myself with a tired, 8-foot sturgeon that “looked” like it was ready to be let go. As it surfaced near the shore, we finally got to see the magnitude of the fish.

Approaching the bank.

Approaching the bank.

Sturgeon landed.

Sturgeon landed.

Chuck grabbed the line as the fish hit the shore and Jenna, Bryan, Rebecca and I made our way down the bank towards the water. Hook out of the fish’s mouth, Bryan snapped a few photos and then it was bye-bye sturgeon. I was no longer a virgin.

By the time I’d landed the fish, it was 3:50 pm – 10-minutes before my original leave time. We stood around for a few minutes reveling in the catch and the weekend and then it was time for me to depart. I thanked everyone for their hospitality and for letting me use their gear and pull on some fish, and then I got in my truck and headed home.

To say last weekend opened my eyes would be an understatement. Not only did I get to pull on some truly magnificent fish but I also got to meet some new people who I’m sure will become lasting friends over the course of time. That’s what I like about this sport and Idaho – the people involved are predominantly upstanding people who would give the shirt off their back to make your experience one to remember.

Thank you all – Chuck, Jenna, Robert, Rebecca, Kim and especially my buddy Bryan for such a great trip. I look forward to the next time with anticipation.

Left to right: Jenna, me, Chuck, Robert and Rebecca.  Bryan was behind the camera.

Left to right: Jenna, me, Chuck, Robert and Rebecca. Bryan was behind the camera.

Afterword

As I was heading east on highway 84, some 70 to 80 miles away from the river, I received a call from Bryan: “Terry, have you seen my camera? We have a 10-footer on and I can’t find my camera. I think I left it on your boat.”

Sure enough, in the maylay after my fish, he had placed his Nikon D300 on the front deck of my boat and I drove off with it. Thank God it was still there when I pulled over on the highway to check. Unfortunately for me, though, I was 70 miles from the action and getting to witness a 10-foot dinosaur. Oh well, it just gives me an excuse to go back.

Catching Dinosaurs – Part Two. “It Looks Like a Sturgeon……..”

June 16th, 2009 by battisti

Photo Credit Bryan Forsmann and battisti

Fighting the fish took me back to my ocean days – the fish had command and I was along for the ride. After a couple runs downstream and 15 minutes of sulking in the 30-foot depths of the river, it was time for my first sturgeon to come in. That’s when my first sturgeon turned into my nemesis – a.k.a. my, “it looks like a sturgeon, Terry, only smaller.”

Fighting my first sturgeon which turned out to be only 5 feet.

Fighting my first sturgeon.

So, with my first, albeit small, 5-footer to shore, I was still a virgin in their eyes but at the same time, it lit a fire under me. If a 5-foot freshwater fish could pull like that, I could only imagine what an 8- or 9-footer would feel like.

I’d have to wait until the following afternoon for that to happen, though, as nothing bit the rest of the night.

5-footer on shore.

5-footer on shore.

Day Two

The following morning nobody was early to rise. The reason for this is if we had stayed up another 30 minutes, we would have been able to see the sun rise – yes, we stayed up with the hope that another fish would eat our offerings of crappie carcasses to no avail.

By 8:00 am, most of the camp was up, rods baited and strategically placed within the seams of current where dinosaurs lurk. Kim and his crew had already hooked a couple fish and the smell of spuds and smoked bacon wafted throughout the camp.

As we ate pig and eggs we gazed at the hypnotic bounce of rod tips and thunder clouds assembling southwest from our vantage point – the wrong direction if we wanted dry weather later in the day.

No one but us land-dwellers was interested in eating that morning.

By 11:00 am the weather had taken a drastic turn. Thirty-mph winds whipped through the camp and I could only imagine what the water looked like on the reservoir above. And still the sturgeon didn’t cooperate.

Finally around 2:30 pm the wind laid down and Jenna and Robert wanted to try their hand at some perch and crappie. We headed to the secret perch spot and within 30 minutes got blown off the water due to a massive thunderstorm that rolled through. It wasn’t all a loss, though, since in that time we caught 15 crappie (bait) and 33 jumbo perch (dinner).

Back at camp, the report was Kim caught a couple. We waited out the storm and an hour later we headed back to the lake – this time Bryan, Robert and myself – for more bait and dinner.

Upon returning, one of Kim’s gang was on – a good fish.

Fish on for another virgin.

Fish on for another virgin.

8-footer on the bank.

8-footer on the bank.

Again, Robert and I took to the fish-cleaning duties, him with the electric fillet knife (I have to get one of those) and me cutting the rib cages out of the fillets. After cleaning a 10-pound bag worth of perch, I sat down, not wanting anything to do with 30-plus more crappie, and rested as Bryan took over.

Sturgeon ready for release.

Sturgeon ready for release.

Meanwhile, Chuck had moved his cadre of rods down the bank in order to try another stretch of water – all his rods except one. I eyed the rod and felt the urge to bait it and cast it to “the” spot where we’d been fishing the last 24 or so hours. I pinned a freshly caught crappie carcass on the hook and casted into the seam. As soon as I set it in the rod holder, the tip started to bounce. But this bounce was not the sinker rolling on the bottom or a carp hitting the line. I picked the rod up, felt weight and set the hook into an 8-foot torpedo. FISH-ON!!!

Putting on the pressure.

Putting on the pressure.

In no more than 10 strokes of its tail, the fish was beyond the middle of the river and on the surface – this was no, “looks like a sturgeon only smaller.”

After 15 minutes of playing tug of war in the middle of the river, the fish decided to come back towards the shore. Unfortunately for me, it went directly to a deep hole next to the bank where the line would rub against every rock between me and the fish. These fish didn’t survive all these millennium by being stupid. After a 2-minute soak in the hole, it decided to head straight into the middle of the river towards the turbine wash and pow, I was on my ass. The 80-pound line parted and my first “real” sturgeon was gone.

Within the next 30 minutes, we hooked three more fish of the same caliber – two of which were handed off to me – and I proceeded to break off my two while Chuck landed the third. We were on them big time.

That evening we hooked 8 fish landed 4 and I was still a sturgeon virgin.

Chuck on one of four fish hooked in 30 minutes.

Chuck on again!

Chuck's fish ready for release.

Chuck's fish ready for release.

Thursday I’ll post Part III – Terry Lost His Cherry

Catching Dinosaurs – Part One

June 15th, 2009 by battisti

Photo Credit Bryan Forsmann and battisti

I’ve fished since I was four-years old. At first it was for anything that would eat a worm or a wad of cheese squeezed onto a treble hook. As I got older, though, my attention turned to bass and the ocean – you can say I became somewhat of a snob. If I wasn’t blazing down the lake at 65 mph or hung on a 100-pound tuna, it wasn’t for me.

Yeah, I’d take the occasional night of catfishing or go trout fish but it wasn’t my cup of tea.

As I got into my early 20s, though, I began to see other species in a different light. I grew fond of catching 2- to 3-pound bluegill at Lake Perris and catching 20-pound cats out of Lake Castaic. I also got maniacally into fly fishing. Don’t get me wrong, I’ll always consider myself a bass angler first and foremost, but at the same time, if someone asks me to fish something I haven’t fished before, I’ll surely take them up on the offer.

Case in point – this past weekend.

A close friend of mine that I work and fish with has, for years, bugged me to go fish sturgeon with him on the Snake River. I’ve never caught one or even had much of an inkling to do so. Why? Because to me it was like catfishing – using cut bait on big rods with big line and waiting…….waiting…….and more waiting for a fish to eat. I’m too ADHD to sit and wait – no matter how much Keystone Light is in the coolers.

Anyway, last Wednesday my friend asked me if I wanted to go sturgeon fishing. I had already planned on taking the boat out and since there’s a reservoir above where they sturgeon fish, I figured I could fish bass during the day and sit and partake in adult beverages with them at night. Not a bad idea as far as I was concerned.

Friday around noon, as I was driving the 285 miles from my house to the lake/river, I received a text from my buddy that they already caught a 7-footer and had lost another in the 8-foot class. My thoughts were, “they’re gonna catch’em all before I even get there.” I looked in my rearview mirror, saw my boat and figured we’d catch bass all weekend long.

I arrived at the destination roughly around 2:00 pm, went to see my buddy and he introduced me to the sturgeon clan – a motley crew of sturgeon fanatics consisting of Chuck, Chuck’s daughter Jenna, Kim and his crew, Robert, and Robert’s wife Rebecca. As I shook hands, I saw the rods loaded in their rocket-launcher holders – tips bobbing as the 10-mph current ran across their lines anchored by 14 ounces of weight. The smell of cut bait, coming from a 7-gallon bucket, permeated the air for at least a 30-foot radius. I was sturgeon fishing.

By the time I’d arrived, the clan had caught another fish in the 7-foot range but I wasn’t ready to sit. Heck, I’d just sat for nearly 4 hours. I wanted to go up to the lake and fish bass.

chuck-perch-cj

Perch Fishing

Up on the lake, I quickly decided to go check out one of my spots where I take the kids perch fishing. Yeah, it wasn’t bass but I’m allowed to change my mind and the fact I think perch are the best tasting fish in freshwater (before you get your undies in a wad, perch are the ONLY fish I eat out of freshwater) I wanted to get some for the frying pan that evening.

After an hour, my buddy Bryan, Chuck and I had the livewell full of tasty treats and at least an hour of cleaning to do. That and we all were feeling a bit parched. So, it was time to head back to the river, clean fish, have a cervesa and fish dinosaurs.

Upon arriving at the camp, Robert and I made quick duty of the perch and began to cook – me battering the fillets and him cooking them. Then, the words FISH-ON filled the air.

As we stood and watched, Chuck had hooked the first fish of the evening. Fighting it on an 11-foot rod with 80-pound string, he had his hands full as the 8-foot prehistoric fish essentially did as it pleased in the current of the river. But, to watch Chuck fight a fish is like watching a seasoned saltwater angler put the hurt on a 300-pound tuna. He kept the rod high and made the fish work for each inch, foot or hundred yards of line it wanted. Within 20 minutes the fish was subdued and at the shore.

Chuck fighting the first sturgeon since my arrival.

Chuck fighting the first sturgeon since my arrival.

In Idaho, sturgeon are a protected species. You can fish them and catch them but you must leave the fish in the water as you unhook and release it. And folks, if you think that getting knee deep in water next to a sturgeon that’s 2-feet taller and outweighs you by 100-pounds is exciting, try catching them on barbless hooks.

To say I was impressed would be an understatement. Here you have a freshwater fish weighing 300 pounds that, when hooked, clears the water and then sulks in the depth of the river until either the angler or the fish wears out. Sturgeon, in my best description, are the freshwater combination of a mako shark coupled with a yellowfin tuna.

Coming to the bank.

Coming to the bank.

As the night wore on, it was my turn – so to speak. Because I was the only “sturgeon virgin” in our group, the next fish was mine. Now, I don’t like to have fish handed off to me but since I was using their gear and the fact it was my first time, I had no problem with it. 30 minutes after Chuck’s 8-footer, a rod went down, Chuck set the hook and then yelled TERRY. Belt around my waste – since when do you need a fighting belt in the freshwater – Chuck handed me the rod and it was fight on.

I’ll post Part II – Terry’s a Sturgeon Virgin – Wednesday.

Gary Loomis is Back?

May 22nd, 2009 by battisti

The name Gary Loomis has been synonymous with state-of-the-art rod design for nearly 30 years.  Be it fly rods, steelhead rods or bass rods, if the product has the G.Loomis name on it, the customer knows they’re getting the best money could buy.  Therefore, when G.Loomis was purchased by Shimano a few years back, anglers were worried, and rightfully so, that their tried and true rods and blanks would diminish in quality and maybe even quantity.  Then, on April 23, 2009, the bad news came – G.Loomis would no longer be in the business of producing custom rod blanks after the year 2009.

Those words reverberated amongst the custom rod builders throughout the nation.

In the last few weeks, though, rumors and rumblings have been heard on TackleTour and in the corners of small tackle shops all around the west that Gary Loomis is starting a new venture.  Is it a rod/blank company?  Well, we don’t know for sure but I just got off the phone with a gentleman at a manufacturing plant in Washington State who wouldn’t say yes or no as to whether or not Gary Loomis is getting back into the rod or blank industry.  But, he did say he’d have “Gary” call me when he got back into the office.  Stay tuned for more information.

Name That Bait II

April 27th, 2009 by battisti

worms1resize2It’s been a couple weeks since I posted on the Tog and since then I have been on a bittersweet trip to the Delta and have spent the remaining time on airplanes and in hotels for work.  Unfortunately I haven’t had much time to think of fishing, let alone reply to emails (Cal, I owe you a reply) or even think about writing.  So here is an easy way for me to get back into the swing of things here at the Tog – Name That Bait II.

Here are three original baits from a company that was started in 1980 in Long Beach, CA. The original company was based out of a warehouse at the Long Beach International Airport and I actually picked up the innaugural order in 1980 for the tackle shop I worked for in Norwalk, CA.   The company was shut down by the IRS in 1983 and a man who was never in the tackle business bought the company, renamed the company and moved it out of state.

What I am looking for is the name of the original company, and the original owner’s name.  If you win, you again get the pride associated with knowing something that not many people know – I think.

battisti

What a Difference a Day Can Make

April 12th, 2009 by battisti

Based on the mood I was in 10 days ago, it’s hard to imagine I’d get out of it. The last 6 months has been a trying time and having only fished once since November I needed a break. Fishing, as it is with most of you probably, is my way to decompress and get back to normal.

So, last Saturday I hooked up the boat and headed to the California Delta. Here’s the report.

Sunday April 5, 12:00 noon: Launch the boat head to Whiskey Slough. Fish with a couple friends named Matt and Eric who I’d met at the campground the night before. They were fishing the WON Bass Super Team event but they had boat problems and couldn’t fish Sunday. Nothing in Whiskey so we head to Turner. Nothing in Turner and it’s getting close to Sunday weigh-in time so we head back towards Frank’s.

2:30 pm: One-quarter mile from Frank’s the number-6 piston decides is likes the top of the cylinder and the rod pulls the wrist pin out. Thankfully a gentleman named Tony stops and tows me in to Russo’s.

Monday April 6, 8:00 am: I head to Modesto to drop the boat off at Bob’s Marine.

11:00 am: I head back to Russo’s to fish the rest of the day with Charlie Weyer. We were going to fish all week side-by-side but now he has to put up with me in his boat the rest of the week.

1:00 pm: We head to the Connection area and I throw a frog up under a tree. I watch as a submarine follows the bait out but doesn’t eat it. Estimated size at the time – 10-11 pounds.

3:00 pm: Charlie bags a 3 1/2-pound fish on a crank and I follow it up with a 6-pounder.

5:00 pm: We’re cranking Taylor and I get bit. Charlie asks if it’s a good fish and I say no. The fish is swimming towards the boat and when the line comes tight 10 feet away from the rail, I realize its size – 10-plus. I fight the fish at the boat for about 15 seconds and the hooks pull.

We fish the rest of the evening taking some time for pictures and head back in to Discovery Bay where we’re staying.

Tuesday April 7, 8:30 am: Mark Lassagne shows up to fish with us.

10:00 am: Lassagne puts the only fish of the morning in the boat – a 5-pounder.

1:00 pm: We head back to Discovery Bay to drop Mark off and take pictures.

2:30 pm: We head to Woodward, its spitting rain as it has all day. I hook another fish on the crank, get it to the boat and its another pig – 10-plus. Hooks pull out.

3:00 pm: I’m throwing a spook and watch as a 10-plus fish follows my bait to within 10-feet of the boat. Fish eats spook and has the entire bait in its mouth sideways. I’m tight to the fish, rod loaded and hooks pull and Spook hits Charlie in the head.

3:30 pm: Throwing the Spook still, another 10-plus eats the bait 10-feet from the boat, I let the fish and bait go down and pull up to set the hook – Spook flies out of water and almost hits me.

We fish the rest of the day and caught one in the 4- to 5-pound range and call it a day at 7:00 pm.

Wednesday April 8, 8:00 am: We head towards the south and make a stop before hitting Victoria. On my 5th or 6th cast I get bit. The fish is swimming again towards the boat and then comes out of the water. Thankfully the hooks hold this time and we put a 10-4 in the well.

10:30 am: We head way up the Middle River and Charlie boats a 7, 6, 6 and a 5 on the dummy bait – i.e: Chatterbait.

5:00 pm: We head out of the Middle River back towards Discovery. We stop as the clouds open up for a few minutes and take pictures of the fish. While taking pics, Charlie dumps the 7 in the water never to be seen again. LOL. No pics of that fish…..

Terry with 4 Delta toads.

Terry with 4 Delta toads.

7:00 pm: We head in to Discovery and stop at the island outside the bay. Charlie and I whack the small 2-pound fish all the way around the island on Spooks and Traps.

Thursday, April 9, 8:00 am: We head back to Modesto to pick up my boat. Mercury doesn’t have a powerhead in stock so I have to tow my boat back to Idaho and take it to my dealer.

12:00 noon: We make it back to Discovery eat lunch and fiddle-fart around until 3:00 pm.

3:00 pm: We head out of Orwood and go towards Frank’s. Fish Franks, nothing.

4:00 pm: Head towards the Cut and Charlie gets a 3 1/2-pound fish.

4:30 pm: We head towards the Break – Nothing.

5:30 pm: We fish Iron Horse and Emerson – Nothing.

7:00 pm: We head in.

Friday April 10, 9:00 am: I head home and Charlie goes fishing.

11:00 am: Charlie calls to tell me the fish that chased my frog in Connection wasn’t 10 to 11 pounds but more like 13 to 14 pounds. Senko Fish. He lost it when it came up at the boat, opened its mouth and spit the hook.

What seems like a bust trip actually was a good one. Although I lost 4 fish in the double-digit class, I got one in the boat and that day we had 34 pounds for five. That day made my entire last 6 months somewhat tolerable. Now I just have to get my motor running again and get through the kids’ soccer season. In June, the Delta better watch out – I’m heading back for Redemption.

Taking A Break

March 30th, 2009 by battisti

My normal job as an engineer can be rewarding at times.  I get to play with things that very few get even see in their lifetime and I get to hang with some really interesting people.  But, like most “day jobs”, it has its moments.  The past two months have been “these moments”.  I’ve been working 7 days a week for most of that time and trying to fit in hanging with the kids and my writing.  To say I’ve reached burn-out stage is, well, an understatement.  Right now my job isn’t loving me back eventhough I have given it so much of myself since the beginning of the year.  So, it’s time to take some time.

Saturday morning I’m hooking my boat up, a 2008 BassCat Cougar FTD I purchased in May last year (it has 5 hours on it), and I’m towing it to northern California to spend 5-6 days fishing waters that I love.  In that time I hope to forget about life at “the Site” and spend some time in the boat I bought to use instead of collect dust in my garage.   The hard part is going to be pulling my gear out of the rubbermaid boxes its called home for the last year due to a remodel.  But hey, the fact is I’m getting away and hopefully the fish will cooperate.  If they don’t, at least I’ll have a good time on the water and in the boat.

Name that bait

March 24th, 2009 by battisti
spinnerbait_resize

Can you name this spinnerbait?

Okay, here’s a contest for you all.  If you win, you get the satisfaction that you knew a bait that hasn’t been around for around 15 years.

I have caught more fish on this spinnerbait than any other spinnerbait I have ever used.  Not this EXACT bait but this series of baits.  I started fishing this company’s spinnerbaits back in the late 70s and continue to do so with what few I have left.  In the later years they went from the thick 0.035 wire to a thinner 0.025 wire and the baits didn’t work the same.  This company was also the first company to offer a double cupped blade.   They offered the bait in a tandem Colorado and a single Colorado configuration and I preferred the tandem bait in normal conditions.  But the single bladed bait worked wonders as a bottom-bouncing bait but really excelled as a night-time bait at my favorite golf courses around southern California.  In fact, on a bait like this (rigged with a black vinyl skirt, stock copper blade and #1 Uncle Josh pork frog trailer) My friend Dave and I caught over 50 fish one night from the Los Alamitos Naval Air Base golf course ponds between 4 and 8 pounds.  That was a night to remember.

What were they thinking?

March 21st, 2009 by battisti
fr7_andfr5_resize

FR7 and FR5 Fat Raps. Both are the old SD color yet only one has the original orange belly.

One thing I don’t understand about the fishing tackle industry is; more often than not, a manufacturer will develop something that’s just awesome, they’ll sell it for a number of years and then they’ll take it off the market for no reason. The old green Curado 200 is a prime example of this. Great reel, sold more than any other reel made and they lasted. I don’t think anyone who was an aficionado of that reel has recuperated from it being taken off the market.

Another piece of tackle that was near and dear to me that simply vanished off the shelves was the old original Rapala Fat Rap. This bait came out in the mid-70s and they continued to manufacture the things through the 90s. I sold these baits for 10 years at the tackle shop I worked at from 1978 to 1988 and I would wager we went through 10 cases a month.

The beauty of these baits was in their simplicity. The colors changed a little over the years but overall these baits never changed. They came in two sizes, FR5 and FR7, had no rattles and tracked straight right out of the box. The original colors were SD (shad), CW (crawdad) and P (perch). Then in about 1980 they came out with the color SFC (chartreuse) that was just phenomenal. About the same time Rapala did away with the original shad colored bait and came out with their S color shad, which instead of having silver painted sides, an orange under belly and the typical shad dot, it had foil sides and a red throat. I don’t think the new S-colored bait was as good as the original SD-colored bait but it still produced.

I never thought Rapala, one of the kingpins of the crankbait industry, would ever eliminate the original Fat Rap from their lineup but how wrong was I.

fr5s_resize

Three FR5 Fat Raps in SD, SFC and CW patterns.

In the late 1990s Rapala came out with the plastic version of the bait – which was about as worthless as the Popeil Pocket Fisherman – but they continued to make the original balsa baits. I wasn’t worried and continued to buy them as needed.

Then one day around 2000 I went into the tackle shop to replace some of my Fat Raps and the pegs were empty. I asked the tackle guy – who knew as much about tackle as Paris Hilton knows about class – and he said they stopped making the baits, including the plastic version. Of course that couldn’t be right, this guy didn’t know what he was talking about. Well, Johnny Tackle Boy was right, the Fat Rap had met its demise; more than likely from the stroke of a bean-counter’s pen.

How could a company make such a productive lure, both in sales and on the water, spend money to develop its plastic brother and then, because the plastic bait stunk, cut both lines from the production line? It just boggles my mind.

My current supply of Fat Raps maintains itself due to certain online auction sites and friends that look out for them for me. But, someday that source will dry up and my stock will dwindle to the point I won’t want to throw the remaining gems anymore for fear of losing my last one in an important tournament and then I’ll be screwed.

Until then, I guess I’ll keep searching, buying and hoarding all the while wondering what the heck was Rapala thinking?

Featuring the First Palming Plate and a Disengaging Level-Wind

March 17th, 2009 by battisti

If you saw the title phrase in a magazine reel advertisement today, you’d more than likely say, “So?” But, if you were reading that advertisement in say, 1976, you’d not only be intrigued but pumped by the fact that the company had taken steps to increase your cast length alews-bb1-oldschoolnd make the reel more ergonomic (I don’t even think the study of ergonomics was around in 1976) for the angler.

Up until the mid-70s, casting reels were heavy, featured the spool-tension knob on the sideplate opposing the handle (I could have said left sideplate but I wanted to respect you wrong-handed casters) and some, like the Ambassadeur 5000, didn’t even have bearings but brass bushings. At that time, the popular baitcasting manufacturers were Ambassadeur (ABU-Garcia), Diawa (the Millionaire series), Shakespeare and Pflueger with the most popular, in terms ruggedness and castability, being the first mentioned.

The deal was everyone used them with confidence and pride because there was no other benchmark in which baitcasting reels were judged. Ignorance is bliss.

That all changed in the mid-70s when Lew Childre turned the baitcasting reel industry on its ear with the new Lew’s Speed Spool. I remember the first time I saw one in a tackle store – the reel looked goofy, almost like half a reel due to the fact the left sideplate had no spool-tension knob on it. It also had a strange shape that, unbeknownst to me, was actually a design feature to improve casting distance.

So, what did the new reel offer compared to the old standbys and why was it so earth shattering?

As stated earlier, the reel was the first to offer a handle-side spool-tension knob which allowed the overall reel width to be decreased significantly. This may seem like a minor adjustment to today’s anglers but it was the foundation of all future reel designs to come. It allowed anglers to more comfortably palm their reels which resulted in less hand fatigue over the course of a day’s fishing.

The second breakthrough this reel possessed was the disengaging level-wind. Childre was obsessed with designing a reel that would cast further than any other reel on the market. He knew that moving parts create friction and therefore by designing the reel so the level-wind didn’t move back and forth during the cast would decrease distance-hogging friction and result in longer casts.

The third advance was the line-guide itself. Childre, who played a major role in the design of the then-new Fuji ceramic guides, decided that if these guides would increase cast length by placing them on a rod, it should do the same if using one as the line-guide on a level-wind. Childre also located the line-guide as far away from the spool as possible, thus decreasing even more friction during the cast (and the reason for its strange shape).

The fourth major contribution this reel presented was the fact that it was low-profile. Although the height of the reel was the same as its counterparts, the reel foot was placed higher towards the centerline of the reel in order for it to sit lower on the rod. Another ergonomic aspect that many anglers didn’t notice until they fished it.

The Lew’s Speed Spool also offered a larger drag surface-area, which drastically increased drag smoothness and nearly solved the problem of drag stick, a problem that the competition had always fought. Childre also placed the best enclosed bearings (2) that could affordably be placed in a reel at the time and rounded out the reel with a paddle-style power handle instead of the small single-knob handles that were standard on the competition’s reels of the time.

To today’s angler, these improvements may not seem to be a big deal but at the time they spawned a revolution in the reel design industry. So much so that Shimano, the original equipment manufacturer of the Speed Spool, broke ties with Lew Childre and Son’s to embark on a new venture in 1977 to introduce their own Bantam line of fishing reels. At that time, Shimano had only been a manufacturer of high-end bicycle parts.

If one compares today’s reels to the Speed Spool of 1976, there are few differences. In fact, every reel produced today has each of the features the Speed Spool introduced. Only the incorporation of more bearings, magnets and even electronic braking systems are the only deviations from the original design.

Over the years I owned more than a dozen of the BB1 Speed Spools. Unfortunately, as I replaced them with more state-of-the-art reels, I gave them away to friends, as parts reels, or collectors. I wish I had kept one of them just for posterity as they were truly a groundbreaking piece of equipment.

Where we came from

March 12th, 2009 by battisti

Hi Everyone,

Well, this is my first attempt at a blog – or Tog as we call it at TackleTour.com.  When JIP and Cal asked me to do this I was a bit hesitant.  Hesitant because what can someone talk about in a one-way dialogue once or more a week and still keep it interesting?  After thinking it over I committed to participate and then, the epiphany hit me.  Actually, it hit me while talking to a close friend and western stalwart of an angler, Gary Dobyns.

Gary and I were doing an interview last night as we do quite frequently.  I love to talk with Gary because; 1) I don’t have to drag words out of his mouth to fill an article, 2) He’s as intricate as it gets when describing what he wants to convey, and 3) at the end of our “interviews”, the conversation always strays to fishing in general.  It’s these off-the-record talks that I enjoy most mainly because we’re just BSing about our passion, talking about new gear or even talking about some friend of ours (Pete).

Last night’s interview was status-quo.  After phone tag for about 60 minutes we hooked up and got to the job at fingertip.  Interview done, we took our usual tangent talking about Pete, the problems with tournaments today and of course his rod company.  Then, just as we were about to call it a night, the subject of sonars came up.  One thing led to another and the next thing you know we’re trying to outdo each other remembering the old sonars of past.  Units like the Lowrance 1510 series, the Humming Bird Super Sixty and the old Vexilar paper graphs.  Sonars turned into old plastics, which turned into old boats and that eventually turned into old reels, rods and other bass-fishing related items.

That’s when I fell off the proverbial log – if we’re having this much fun talking about the gear of old, wouldn’t people like to remember, through TackleTog, about the gear they used to use in the old days?  Or, what about those who are tackle junkies (Cal)?  Wouldn’t the nouveaux tackle junkies like to see pictures and hear stories of tackle that was the genesis of the gear they use today? Well, I thought they would and since I am the megalomaniac of this space, I decided that’s what I’d write about in this Tog.

So, put on your time-travel helmet, grab that old Ambassadeur 5000D that’s clamped to your Lew’s Speed Stik and take a ride with me.  I can’t promise it’ll always be a smooth ride and from time to time I may stray from the topic at hand and talk about my kids’ soccer adventures but I can guarantee I’ll have plenty of words for you to read.

Recent Comments

Categories

Recently Updated Blogs

Archive

  • Hot Tags